Globalization: Embracing Cross-cultural Understanding And Transcending Differences
You’re living in a vibrant multicultural country, so it’s great that you want to understand cultures other than your own. There are a few ways to do this, but the most important is to remember that we’re all just people who are trying to do the best we can. So, taking each person on their own merit will always see you right. It can be very easy to stick with what you know, rather than trying to meet people who are different from you. However, actively trying to understand and embrace cultural differences can open you up to a whole world of exciting new possibilities and experiences.
The concept of autonomous, consistent and stable societies is becoming progressively uncommon in today’s globe of interconnectedness. Globalization processes draw individuals from distinct cultural backgrounds into close contact, as can be seen in the extraordinary growth of tourism. Man has been exploring and migrating from his places of origin from the foundations of civilization. Cultures have mixed from the beginning of man, conquering, ruling, banished, assimilated or extinct. The earth has become very much linked with the fast development of innovation, so cultures have mixed more in human history than at any other moment. The way we connect each other and to the globe has been radically altered by technology. It has extended our reach with speed and effectiveness to other nation states and cultures, clearing us of cross-cultural knowledge and understanding. In this regard, the concept of society is no distinct from other human concepts. In reality, in some situations, there are a range of conflicting phrases that have comparable meanings to society. The list could include: gender, socio-cultural group, country, lifestyle, tradition, civilization, race, color, customs, etc. Some of these concepts have helpful and well-defined meanings for modern sociology, while others are component of the discipline’s past and have no lawful use today. In fact, trying to tell what culture is doesn’t make much sense. Nevertheless, what can be achieved is to tell what culture does and how society does it.
Globalization is inevitable. And as such, how it impacts personal cultures all over the globe relies on how people choose to connect to each other. Global cultural collaboration and dispute resolution will result from the embrace of prevalent universal principles rooted in established beliefs. One sociologist, Roland Robertson defines globalization as “the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole”. Martin Albrow, another scientist, thinks that tourism is the move toward a ‘worldwide culture.’ However, yet another scientist in the sector, Arjun Appadurai thinks that it will introduce complexity and discord between distinct societies with the power innovation on globalization. Appadurai also indicates that cultural variety, not cultural uniformity or domination, will prevail as a consequence of five’ scapes’: ‘ethnoscapes, mediascapes, technoscapes, financial scapes, and ideoscapes. Ethnoscapes refer to people’s movements, like visitors and newcomers. Technoscapes include boundary-crossing technology. Finance capabilities relate to monetary market movements. Media scenarios refer to technology and pictures in the mass media. Ideoscapes… refer to the political and ideological elements. Consequently, media will undoubtedly shed higher light on cultural distinctions and variety will arise. Mass media performs a significant part in social development, which is the development of a particular collection of principles and opinions that are mainly distributed around the world (Castells, 2009, p. 117). This shared set of principles and convictions apparently breaks down culture, erodes racial stereotypes, and unites varied groups around common ideals. Globalization is both critical because of the chance to reach a varied yet peaceful worldwide community and because of the main obstacles to universal cross-cultural comprehension: cultures, languages, political, financial structures and religious or belief structures. Today, the chance and challenging of bridging the differences and embracing similarities is more emerging and essential than at any moment in history. Originally native belief systems are spread through globalization. In some popular principles, most have origins. Values could function as the grounds for tolerance and international or intercultural collaboration. Cultural evolution and globalization depend on cultural diversity`s collaboration, acceptance, and tolerance, rooted in spiritual and faith structures with a dominant faith scheme, almost all societies on earth have developed, often but not always manifesting themselves as what is frequently called a structured or organized religion. Religion is any specific system of belief about deity, often involving rituals, a code of ethics, and a philosophy of life. There will be no effort here to identify the huge amount of globe religious and non-religious faith schemes, a task far too huge for this writing. Because of what was dictated by our upbringing or was predominant in our portion of the globe, our belief scheme was provided to us by pure opportunity of birth until and when we deliberately choose differently later in existence.
Traditionally, even in predominantly secular cultures, religion has served as a source of power, legislation, and moral standards for culture. Throughout most of the world’s history, spiritual traditions have formally linked with governments and have been seen as a significant cause of leaders ‘ legitimacy. Given the variety of faith structures adhered to throughout the world, it is critical to the ongoing advancement in the development of human culture that we continue to strive to embrace an increasingly tolerant view towards our different cultures. Because beliefs are the cause of social beliefs in almost all instances, we can recognize many of these principles as prevalent among societies, which inevitably bridges the divide between our distinctions. Belief schemes are usually anchored in sets of principles adopted and decided upon. Even those who conform to a fundamental collection of common natural principles hold non-traditional, non-faith faith schemes. Through these fundamental human principles, we can see that comparable or equal beliefs and beliefs are prevalent throughout the large majority of world societies. Humanity is conceived from the same DNA and therefore has the same fundamental requirements beyond nutrition and refuge, irrespective of the culture or faith scheme.
Subscribing to the faith that there are far too many prevalent values to be enumerated, here are those that seem to be the essence of mankind. Like regard, honesty, fairness and intent, love is universal. Every person seeks or strives within his globe to generate inspiration, as well as to work together to make a shift. Everyone has hope in his core. Trust is essential to the socialization of man in the world, even if it is the most violated and retained value we hold. Honor is also universal, if only to loyalty yourself and your own presence; all forms of beliefs and philosophies value something’s respect. Devotion and engagement are universal as well. It is essential to our life to learn about our globe, our God, how to survive, some part of teaching. All cultures acknowledge and value bravery, determination, sacrifice, perseverance in the face of any barrier, as well as in some manner seeking justice. Leadership is widely appreciated for either to lead or to be led. In any society, strength in all its types is acknowledged and appreciated and I think that kindness and gratitude are universal values as well. All these qualities and principles are universal, transcending all religions and cultures.
Civilization has been the broadest cultural institution, thus becoming crucial to worldwide politics disputes between organizations of distinct civilizations. In today’s world enhancement in transportation and communication, the interaction between individuals of distinct cultures has been more common, more intense, more symmetrical, and more inclusive. As a consequence, they have become progressively prominent in their civilization identity. All things regarded, globalization did not end disputes, but rather created fresh culturally related identities. This implies that this created a globalization paradigm through which the whole earth can be viewed.
Challenges to cross-cultural understanding are frequently addressed. Our society’s multicultural nature was overlooked. The enriching importance of varied societies has not been recognized by most nations. Cultural diversity is now a fact of life in today’s “global village”. Many individuals experienced the adverse impacts of the method of globalization. There have been some protest movements against globalization on new world economic, political, cultural, technological, religious order towards the end of the last closed century, and how the pros and cons of a new global world have been evaluated.
Unique cultures have developed indigenously through centuries of human civilizations, that is, located from other societies, often at excellent geographical distances from their own. Everyone created their language, cultures, diet, clothing and belief system with little to no outside impact. One may choose not to distinguish between the personal view of speech and clothing of a culture from that of its faith scheme, which is its understanding of our location in the world, the presence or lack of a greater force, or the invisible impacts on lives. Historically, though, convictions are the most fought among beings over the problem. Most cultural conflicts have been battled over one of four problems throughout history: land disputes, accessible assets, political dominance or spiritual distinctions. Few societies stayed isolationist, making territorial, resource or political conflicts a non-issue. Because world faith structures have evolved to be so distinct, individuals have made it possible to distance them from variations rather than just describe them, making cross-cultural knowledge very hard if not inevitable. Understanding arises from recognition of the fundamental freedoms to personal economic existence and fairness and diversity. Understanding starts by defining principles that are prevalent between the two in the society of another.
If cross-cultural understanding isn’t made a priority in globalization, conflict and further division will emerge in greater force. There are subcultures within a nation, such as regions or communities, and nations can be a small part of a greater civilization. They share cultural features such as language, history, customs, institutions and religion that distinguish them from another culture or community. In disputes, individuals choose which side of the debate they support in terms of country, politics, economics, and even land. But cultural divisions, such as race, culture, culture, speech, and even faith, are to some extent more lasting, less changeable. The point was created that, for several purposes, disputes between cultures will be about society instead of politics in the future. First, globalization leading to increased communication between cultures will cause individuals to identify less with their country and return to their cultural origins for identity. This brings with it the difficulty of improving rather than rejecting or minimizing our cultural distinctions, leading to further dispute in the manner of country states, economics, politics and land. In addition, religion is a key element of social development, with traditions spreading, transnational networks expanding, domestic cultures mixing and fresh methods of viewing the universe emerging. Globalization will only improve as innovation progresses and the globe grows narrower and lower. Cultural war is inevitable if we bring cultural distinctions in a less appropriate view and bring our commonalities to the top of worldwide discussion. This need for cultures to resolve their distinctions makes cross-cultural comprehension essential for both our mutual survival and our worldwide problem-solving. Today’s urgent problems such as environmental crises, political upheaval, financial crash and social decline will be addressed by shared recognition and comprehension of our different views and prevalent principles.
As far as the notion of society, multiculturalism or social diversity is concerned, I have stated that culture is the entire manner of life of individuals, from birth to the death, from dawn to night, and even during bed, has become a clearly inevitable today. Judging from the recognition of the nature of social diversity and, in particular, the manner in which innovation affects society, society is and will always be distinct but compatible. Every culture is worthy of non-interference and precious. Modern cultures in themselves are diverse, embracing a variety of different aspects of life and people’s lifestyles. Most people’s identities today are influenced by more than one society. Not just societies, but multicultural individuals. On the other side, the notion of sustainability implies that societies become the same as the globe. Globalization is a concept of uniformization. Globalization seems to promote not separation, but exchange and interaction of different cultures.
- Carl Strikwerda, From World-Systems to Globalization: Theories of Transnational Change and the Place of the United States, American Studies, 41:2/3 (Summer/Fall 2000). https://journals.ku.edu/index.php/amerstud/article/viewFile/3115/3074 (accessed May 21, 2012)
- Gensler, H. J. 1998. Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge
- Lauren Movius, “Cultural Globalization and Challenges to Traditional Communication Theories”, PLATFORM: Journal of Media and Communication 2(1) (January): 6-18. http://journals.culture-communication.unimelb.edu.au/platform/resources/includes/vol2_1/PlatformVol2Issue1_Movius.pdf (accessed May 21, 2012)
- Samuel P. Huntington, “The clash of civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs; Summer 1993; 72, 3; ABI/INFORM Global, pg. 22
- Thornton, R. 1988, Culture: A Contemporary Definition, Cape Town: David Philip.