Leading And Managing Non-profit Organization

  • Words 1255
  • Pages 3
Download PDF


Stijn Van Puyelde, Ralf Caers, Cind Du Bois, Marc jaegers non-profit and voluntary sector 41(3), 431-451,2012

This article provides a brief knowledge about stakeholder theory on the governance and management of nonprofit organizations. A stakeholder is a person who makes a claim on an organization’s, attention, resource, or any output or those who are affected by the organization (lewis, 2001:202). This stakeholder is divided into three categories interface stakeholder, internal stakeholders, or external stakeholders. In interface stakeholder board of directors is the main governing body of the non-profit organization. It connecting the function between the organization and its environments. managers, employees, and operational volunteers are the internal stakeholders. managers help to manage the organization. Employees give the staff of the non-profit organization and last but not least volunteers involve in inactivity include the provision of goods and services which are offered by a non-profit organization.

Click to get a unique essay

Our writers can write you a new plagiarism-free essay on any topic

1-Rikki Abzug Natalie j. Webb “relationship between non-profit and for-profit organization; A stakeholder perspective”

This article discusses the relationship and behavioral between the organisation of different sector of the economy. in the united state in recent years, non-profit organization get about half income from fees and service charges and mostly half of the income come from commercially competitive travel which is not directly related to the nonprofit organization.

2-Erik Chvojka and Lauri Erik Lehikoinen “ the effect of high board turnover on stakeholders in non-profit sport organizations’

Most of the non-profit sport organizations, getting by on scarce economic resources and trying to discover the exceptional manner to manage numerous stakeholders that are worried in the day-to-day activity are facing intense demanding situation in attempt to respond to converting client desires(young, Hodgkinson, & Associates, 1993). For the development of recreation governance, it is vital to have a look at board construction and its outcomes on organizational overall performance.

3- Mark Barrett, “ a stakeholder approach to responsiveness and accountability in non profit organization (2001) vol19 pp36-37

The significance of non-profit associations as suppliers of social administrations has developed in numerous nations during the previous 15 to 20 years as governments have contracted out direct social administration arrangements. Contentions for social administration arrangement by the non-profit division can be assembled into three classes: viability, cost and responsiveness to network needs. Partner hypothesis (created in the revenue driven area) is utilized here for the situation investigation of a little non-profit association, both to investigate the issue of partner mindfulness and commitment, and to test the materialness of partner hypothesis to the non-profit organisation.

4-Katherine R Cooper “exploring stakeholder participation in non-profit collaboration”(2014)

Despite huge scale cultural or ‘wicked’ issues, associations are urged to take part in system ways to deal with accomplish impacts at a frameworks level. collective effect activities present various difficulties in the coordination of assets and exercises over associations and segments, not least of which is representing various stakeholder points of view. Albeit charitable community-oriented systems assembled for the motivation behind battling a social network. Partner hypothesis gives the establishing to this exploration. Despite the fact that this system is well known in the executives and in hierarchical examinations, an absence of experimental work, an overemphasis on singular partnerships as central associations, and an overreliance on inner stakeholder points of view have slowed down hypothetical advancement. issue may tout the possibility of partner interest, little is thought about how differing partners participate in the system.

5-Lore Wellens, Marc jaegers “effective governance in the non-profit organization”(2014)pg223-243vol 32,2

Nonprofit organizations are increasingly required to become more effective. This methodology is especially significant as various specialists argue that the probability of NPOs being seen as compelling increments when they figure out how to adjust the, potentially assorted, desires for partners on great administration. We thus center around the connection between the requirements and targets of key partners and administration (structures) in NPOs. The partners we consider are government, recipients, private benefactors, board individuals, the executives, volunteers, and non-administrative staff individuals.

6- Maria Inha “stakeholder relationship in a nonprofit network organization” (2015)

The investigation recommends that a system association, for example, EBEN is an aggregate of its connections. The partners’ size and levels of action affect the power dissemination in the partner relationship, which calls for an assessment of hazard factors when settling on key choices on how the reason for the association is advanced. From this viewpoint, as opposed to taking a gander at what the destinations of the partners are, consideration ought to be paid to what are the methods for accomplishing these objectives. Notwithstanding, when the partners of a non-benefit arrange association might be seen as a fairly homogenous gathering that have choice power in the association, the association should search for synergistic components to give a supportable association culture (Wheeler et al. 2003).

7-Dyana P. Mason “common agency in non-profit advocacy organization” (2016)

Most hypotheses of non-profit associations and charitable administration perceive the large number of partners—including board individuals, givers and volunteers, funders, the media, and strategy producers—that authoritative pioneers must battle with in doing their work. For non-profit occupied with support, requests from partners might be considerable all the more testing to meet. In spite of the fact that partner hypothesis perceives the impact of different gatherings on an association, it doesn’t clarify how pioneers deal with the inclinations of their often‐competing partners while they settle on decisions for the association. This examination builds up a typical office system, assessing the jobs of three gatherings pivotal to not-for-profit support associations: the association’s top managerial staff, chose authorities, and contributors/individuals.

8-Colleen L. Mestayer “exploring non-profit volounteerism from a dualperspective” (2016)pg140-142

Correspondence is really a center segment of authoritative life, particularly for this specific contextual analysis of a little, religious not-for-profit association. By utilizing a blended technique approach, the specialist was situated to clarify and better comprehend both sides of volunteerism: the quantitative examination revealed four unmistakable factors helpful in clarifying volunteer fulfillment, and the subjective examination revealed methodologies utilized by the interior partners of the association to keep up a fulfilled volunteer base, too as correspondence procedures for enlistment of volunteers.

9- Syed A. Raza “systemic problems related to multiple stakeholders in technology adoption and use in organization” (2011) vol 24,pg

Innovation reception is anything but a solitary occasion (Attewell, 1992). The pattern managing the change or change of a few independent applications into data frameworks which are commonly associated and disseminated crosswise over associations, impact the structure, standards, and working propensities for an association (Doherty and King, 1998). As indicated by Eveland and Tornatzky (1990), the trend setting innovations are excessively huge and complex for a person’s grip of psychological power, the choices with respect to their selection are likewise tedious. They, rather prescribe a point of view that perspectives dissemination and selection of advances inside settings which involves five components.

10- Matthew Hall, Yuval Millo and E. Barman “who and what realy count? (2015) 52 (7)pp.907-934

The reason for this investigation was to inspect how administrators build up a bookkeeping and revealing framework so as to mirror their prioritization of partners. Thusly, it gives significant bits of knowledge into how administrators can fuse partners’ voices into authoritative practices so as to encourage esteem creation (Neville 2011; Parent and Deephouse 2007). Additionally tried to comprehend the components that can impact supervisors’ capacity to develop a bookkeeping and detailing framework to fuse the voices of remarkable partners.


As we consider above statements so it shows strong relationship between stakeholder theory and nonprofit organization. further, utilization of powerfull initiative style and reception of viable procedures insignificant in various division of an association so as to connect with and support the interrelationship of individuals and accomplish long term development effectively.


We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.