Social Darwinism According To Its Historical View

  • Words 842
  • Pages 2
Download PDF

 Social Darwinism Poem

Social Darwinism is a knowledge-based application to live and survive long and rather go strong in a natural environment without immediate fade off despite all the economic, financial, and maybe the political surrounding issues in a human environment. Social Darwinism refers to the basic act of a being to lively stay for a very long duration of time within its surroundings without facing basic survival issues that might hinder its living and cause it to go live shortly. In a local perspective social Darwinism refers to the life extent any living thing relates to the other living things for its good survival tactics to strictly strive to struggle for a longer duration here on earth. A global perspective view on the social Darwinism refers to how beings living relate to others internationally and even beyond their environs for long time survival

The Motivations and Consequences that Kipling Presents for Undertaking the ‘White Man’s Burden” Poem

In the poem the White Man’s burden, the narrator tries to give his expressions on the dire consequences he has faced taking his most immediate assistant first men to the outside world and also his immediate children so as to freely give justice to those left with him with no much freedom. Individuals held behave weirdly and act in an absurd manner. The narrator expresses how one must abandon all he or she feels will best offer him or her fame so as to successfully give the best gains to the others. He also takes up the heavy task, including ‘the savage wars of peace’ as referred to in the poem which essentially means that one fills the mouths with food and completely gets rid of hunger, sickness, and even diseases that may be caused by lack of enough balanced diet. One should however be careful to strictly avoid getting trapped in the same problems so as to live happily.

Click to get a unique essay

Our writers can write you a new plagiarism-free essay on any topic

The narrator explains the reasons why we both have different characteristics. In between the living and the dead. The exploitations the living can do and else otherwise when they are dead. He also explains the White Man’s burden, which includes being given blame and mockery by the immediate few ones protects. Those hosting them will definitely cry out asking why most persons were brought back to the light to actually make out between the good and the bad.

Informatory about the use of power to cause weakening or havoc is also expressed in this poet by the narrator. He expresses that freedom should never be used as a weakening tool. Conclusions drawn from this is that through repeating to take up the White Man’s cross and abandon youngish behaviors that will make one look stupid and absurd. One must ignore the absurdity and develop to grow into a real man and avoid unnecessary issues. Racism and acclaim for imperialism can’t be left behind, because Kipling never intended the poem to be seen from a negative point of view. In fact, one most careful reading shall show that Kipling was trying to offer warnings to those soughing to undertake such actions and gives warning to anyone trying to allow negative life mobilization to style up and hurriedly understand openly that they will work hard and actually not gain from the frequent praises one could expect.

Specific Examples of Ethnocentrism Identified in the Poem

Ethnocentrism can be viewed in two critical perspectives; how Kipling praises the white man and absolutely how he undergrads individuals who have been colonized. The division of each of the qualities in a table clearly shows the major differences. In the first stanza of the poem, Kipling describes the white man as “the best” bred bound to service and toil. Stanza two tells the white man to be so patient and humble and able to “check the show of pride” This is absolutely in contrast with populations colonized. “Fluttered” and “Wild” fork half-devil and half-child are examples of contrasts taken from this poem of the white man by Kipling.

Reasons Why ‘Half-Devil and Half-Child’ Peoples Were Truly Uncivilized

The ‘Half-devil and half-child peoples were truly uncivilized (Brantlinger, Kipling’s’, 2007) according to the first stanza of the poem as he calls them fluttered folk and the wild as well as half-devil and half-child. This shows how he thinks about the few who are civilized. The reference they are “wild” shows that they are uncivilized in their manner. The term fluttered also means that they are primarily immature as they are also implicated to half-child.

Sloth and heaven holly in the third stanza as Kipling refers to means that they are also very lazy and are not ready at all to work. He also refers to them as foolish and finally says they are “heathen” meaning they are completely uncivilized.


  • Kaye, H. (Betzig, L. L. (2018). Despotism, Social Evolution, and Differential Reproduction. Routledge.
  • Kaye, H. (2017). The social meaning of modern biology: From social Darwinism to sociobiology. Routledge.
  • Kipling, R. (2015). The white man’s burden.
  • Murphy, G. (2010). Shadowing the White Man’s Burden: US Imperialism and the Problem of the Color Line. NYU Press.         


We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.